Kata seorang teman bahan berikut 'Good read'. Sila teliti dan nilai 'good read' ini. Terima kasih John kerana sudi mengonsikan pandangan yang pelbagai.
Suaris
Interview: The Future of Malays Part 4: It is said that Malays are at
a crossroad. This is particularly so with the upcoming General Election
13 where the choice is between feudalism and liberalism. To what extent
do you agree with that viewpoint?
[The original in Malay appeared in suaris.wordpress.com on February 6, 2013.]
MBM: I agree
that we Malays are at a critical juncture. Our choice is between
continuing on the present path that has led us to where we are today,
with our minds still trapped, or make a sharp turn towards liberating
them. Remember that the path to the dumpsite is the one well-trodden.
I do not agree that the forthcoming election (GE 13) will be a choice
between liberalism and feudalism, as I understand both terms. Instead it
will be between a party that has grown old, tired, and bankrupt of
ideas versus another that is young, vigorous, and full of fresh talent.
As an aside, “liberalism” to me means a system that treats every human
as having certain inalienable rights or freedoms granted unto him (or
her) by Almighty Allah, among them, the freedom of thought, to choose
our leaders, own properties, and pursue happiness. Feudalism on the
other hand was the social system prevailing in Medieval Europe where
humans were either lords or peasants. Land, property and peasants
belonged to the lords. Your fate and place in society was determined at
birth and remained fixed throughout life. Meaning, born a peasant, and
you would remain one until death.
Clearly from the perspective of respect for human lives and values, liberalism is closer to Islam than is feudalism.
True, Malay society today still retains many feudal elements.
Nonetheless we are free to choose our leaders. Even though we could not
choose our sultans, we do not consider ourselves slaves to them. Yes, we
use the term “patek” in referring to ourselves when addressing a
member of the royalty. That is merely a habit. A sultan can no longer
grab a village maiden for his palace collection. We hitherto peasants
could now (if we wish to and can afford it) own a house more palatial
than the istana and drive a car that could overtake the sultan’s in speed, price and glamour.
Returning to GE13, before we make a decision as to which party to vote
for, it is prudent to do a downstream analysis. There can only be three
possible outcomes. First, Barisan be returned to power; second, Pakatan
to prevail; and third, neither winning a decisive victory. By decisive I
mean where the buying of a handful of victorious candidates would not
alter the balance of power a la Perak 2008.
If Barisan were to win, that would mean voters approve of the current pervasive corruption and abuse of power.
We would have gone further, essentially rewarding those who have
destroyed MAS, Perwaja, Bank Bumiputra, and others. Expect the greed of
ministers and their families to grow unabated. Our rotten system of
education would continue its decline. Our professors and academic
leaders would continue to be chosen based not on their scholarly
contributions but their ability to suck up to the politically powerful.
Najib would continue to lead as he has for the last four years –
delivering an alphabet soup of acronyms, endless exhortations, and a
surfeit of sloganeering, much like the character in Shannon Ahmad’s
short story Uggapan (Slogans).
Najib promised to, borrowing his latest buzzword, “transform” his
administration. How could he possibly do that when all his ministers
would again stand for election? If they win, they would surely again be
ministers. What transformation did he have in mind? Hishammudin becoming Women’s Minister?
Barisan leaders are scaring citizens into believing that our stability
depends on their winning the election. On the contrary, if Barisan fails
to secure a greater victory than in 2008, (no one is predicting it will
win a supra majority), there will be an ugly power struggle at the top.
The Najib/Muhyyuddin rivalry would eclipse the earlier Abdullah/Najib
power struggle in its messiness. It would be even uglier than the
Mahathir/Ku Li confrontation a generation earlier. The permanent
establishment would be paralyzed, not knowing which faction to support.
Mahathir has already sharpened the knife that he used with devastating
effectiveness on Abdullah. This time the victim would be Najib.
In defeat, there would be much soul searching in Pakatan. Perhaps their
leaders would now resolve to focus on the things that they could agree
on that would benefit the nation and citizens, as with eradicating
corruption and abuse of power, ensuring justice, improving the education
system, while distancing themselves from such meaningless symbolic
items as with an Islamic state and who could use the word “Allah.” Those
obsessions do not contribute to the well being of citizens, on the
contrary, they divide us.
The second possible outcome would be a Pakatan victory. That would not
mean that all our problems would magically disappear. Far from it!
First, Pakatan leaders are only human; there would be a great temptation
to regard their victory as a bountiful harvest. There are many more
family disputes during such times! Expect a not-so-pretty grab for
positions, and contentious issues like who would be Deputy Prime
Minister and whether he (unlikely a she) would be a Malay or non-Malay.
There would also be the jostling for key portfolios as with education,
finance, and internal affairs. Those are to be expected.
The pettiness would challenge the wisdom and patience of Pakatan
leaders. If they were to behave like kids at Hari Raya or Chinese New
Year greedily grabbing duit rayas and ang pows, then their
future and also that of the nation would indeed be gloomy. However, if
they were to consider their victory not as Hari Raya but the beginning
of Ramadan, meaning, a time to be tested, patient, and diligent, then
their and our future would be bright.
More interesting is to imagine what would happen to UMNO in defeat.
Those who joined the party not for the sake of the party and country but
for their greed would quickly abandon it. Their flow of opium would be
cut off. Meanwhile the new 2M team of Mahathir and Muhyyuddin would be
merciless on Najib. Erstwhile sleepy supporters of the equally soporific
Abdullah Badawi would now be intent on exacting revenge on the two
sides.
As ugly and embarrassing as that would be to Malays, it would bring
only good to UMNO. The party would begin its slow and long overdue
rehabilitation, back to it glorious past. Its members would now be
limited only to those who truly love and are passionate about the
organization and of Malays. The party might once again be the pride and
love of our people and not as at present, an enabler for the corrupt and
criminal.
There are two other much more meaningful consequences to an UMNO
defeat. Consider that the corruption of Khir Toyo, former Chief Minister
of Selangor, was only exposed with Pakatan winning the state. Had UMNO
won in 2008, that slimy character would now still be its chief
executive, with his greed and corrupt ways unabated. Because Pakatan
won, he is now awaiting jail, pending appeal, for his corruption
conviction. There are many Khir Toyos at the federal level; they could
only be exposed with a Pakatan victory.
The second important consequence would be on members of the permanent
establishment, from senior civil servants and heads of GLCs to sultans
and professors. They would now realize that their careers are no longer
dependent on their skills at sucking up to Barisan. They would be forced
to examine themselves carefully and not be so politically partisan. The
future of their careers would now depend on their dedication, diligence
and professionalism, not their political skills and leanings. That
could only be good for the country generally and its administration
specifically.
Many, especially in UMNO, predict a vicious racial riot a la
May 1969 with the party’s defeat. I totally disagree. First, in 1969
the power shifted from Malays (UMNO) to Chinese (DAP). If UMNO were to
lose in the coming election, power would still be in Malay hands except
that those Malays would not be from UMNO. Second, our society is much
more wise and mature now. The Chinese for example need not have to
parade with their dragons to show off their might. A look around KL
and Penang would be enough to reassure them and others. And if Malays
were to run amok on the streets, those luxury bungalows and BMWs they
would burn down might just belong to the likes of Khir Toyo and Abdullah
Badawi!
In 1969 UMNO was still Malay, and Malays, UMNO. Today conditions have
changed radically, as evidenced by the recent massive KL112 rally.
Extremists
like Ibrahim the Frog could easily be taken care of. An offer of a
directorship or two and trips to Macao would silence them.
Alternatively, do not impede the anti-corruption agency. I am simply
amused that Malay leaders from Mahathir to the academic Ramlah Adam
would pin the hopes of our race to characters like Ibrahim the Frog.
For Malaysians, the greatest consequence to a Barisan defeat would be
that we actually get to experience and benefit the meaning of free
elections. That is, by merely putting an “X” in the appropriate box on
the ballot paper, we could change our government. There is no need to
riot or demonstrate on the streets. A Barisan defeat would effectively
demonstrate the true meaning of checks and balances in a democracy.
The third and worst possible consequence would be if neither party were
to win convincingly. We had a glimpse of that ugliness in Perak
following the 2008 election. All, politicians from Barisan to Pakatan
and members of the establishment from civil servants to the sultan, did
not shine. Their behavior brought shame to the nation. They however,
were oblivious of that.
Expect that, only worse, in Putrajaya.
The behavior of these politicians would be more flagrant than those of
the ladies of the evening. As odious as that would be, there would be
some redeeming values. We would finally see those politicians for what they really are, worse
than those prostitutes at Chow Kit Road. At least those ladies had the
morality not to sell themselves so openly and in broad daylight.
The odiousness would so enrage many that able and honest citizens would
now be encouraged if not compelled to offer themselves as candidates in
the future. That can only be good! We would finally get to appreciate
the awesome power of the ballot booth and that elections have
consequences, prompting us to be more prudent the next time we vote.
That is one invaluable lesson.
In short, the best outcome for Malaysia in GE 13 would be for Pakatan
to win convincingly. Next would be for neither side to do so. The worst
outcome would be for Barisan to be returned to power. Stated
differently, a hung parliament would be a not-so-pretty Pakatan victory.
No comments:
Post a Comment